http://math-art.net/2008/04/17/hypnotizing-lorentz-transformation/ Where Mathematics and Art blends into a zen-like state of peace Fri, 30 Jul 2010 01:27:19 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1 http://math-art.net/2008/04/17/hypnotizing-lorentz-transformation/#comment-477 Cory Tue, 17 Jun 2008 16:03:56 +0000 http://math-art.net/2008/04/17/hypnotizing-lorentz-transformation/#comment-477 Wouldn't "quark quark" be a better way to end the post about physics? :D Wouldn’t “quark quark” be a better way to end the post about physics?

]]> http://math-art.net/2008/04/17/hypnotizing-lorentz-transformation/#comment-373 Lim Ee Hai Fri, 25 Apr 2008 15:08:17 +0000 http://math-art.net/2008/04/17/hypnotizing-lorentz-transformation/#comment-373 I came across something similar to the Lorentz Transformation posts here. I was looking at the encased plated home fan the other day, and saw the pattern (circular lines) moving about like that presented here. It makes me wonder if there is any maths topics related to this phenomenon. Here I had some findings. Great! I came across something similar to the Lorentz Transformation posts here. I was looking at the encased plated home fan the other day, and saw the pattern (circular lines) moving about like that presented here. It makes me wonder if there is any maths topics related to this phenomenon. Here I had some findings. Great!

]]> http://math-art.net/2008/04/17/hypnotizing-lorentz-transformation/#comment-360 Aaron A. Aaronson Wed, 16 Apr 2008 21:04:42 +0000 http://math-art.net/2008/04/17/hypnotizing-lorentz-transformation/#comment-360 Hmm.. the ? in V = f? is for lambda. I can't figure out why it wouldn't work here. Hmm.. the ? in V = f? is for lambda. I can’t figure out why it wouldn’t work here.

]]>